Winter 2004 Volume 6 Number 1
|
|
THE LIFE OF THE PROGRAM I inherited the CERT program here in Simi Valley, California, in 1999. There was a database chock-full of names of those who had been trained since the 1994 Northridge earthquake. The protocol was for me to graduate two CERT classes per year, which would be trained by the Ventura County Fire Department. I was also tasked with organizing two refresher classes per year, also taught by Ventura County Fire, so that those already trained would be re-trained at least once a year.
|
|
After
about a year it became clear that, for a number of reasons, the protocol
would not work. First, there
was a response problem. When we
advertised for refresher training there was only an 11 percent response from
a database that had more than 400 members.
That same 11 percent held true for stand-by lists for potential
call-outs and actual call-outs themselves…11 percent, a consistent and
annoying 11 percent. Second, even if the response was much higher, as it
should have been, the fire department could only handle two classes of
twenty-five, each year. If the
classes were bigger (which they never were) we would have to turn people
away, and if more than fifty people per year wanted refresher training they
could not be accommodated. Major
change was necessary. Answer
number one was to go through and clean out the database.
Much of the information was outright incorrect, many people declared
themselves too old or to infirm for service, many had moved away, divorced,
etc. and were no longer available to serve.
One third of the database was purged. Of
those left in the database that same 11 percent made themselves available
for training.
That number keeps popping up like a bad penny.
|
|
| It
became evident that most people did not want to be bothered with on-going
disaster service work…they had other priorities.
Once trained and able to take care of their own families, most lost
interest. The
City Council was approached with a plan to re-energize the CERT program,
the gist of which was to reclassify those who no longer wanted to be
bothered with on-going training and service demands.
Letters were sent to all stating that those who wanted to remain as
a response resource had to opt-in to a new Disaster Service Worker
program; those who did not would be re-classified as Disaster Trained
Citizens and de-activated.
|
|
|
Forty-four
members opted in to the DSW training program, despite the strident demands
placed on them: "If you
sign on you must train once a month, participate in an exercise every
quarter, and when called for service, report without delay. You must submit
to a background investigation. You cannot miss class, you cannot be late for
class. Block the time out and show up, no excuses."
All but seven stayed on. My
promise to them was to provide management-level training to reward their
commitment. The goal was to
produce a mobile field force of sorts that can appear at a command post and
be an asset rather than something that HAS to be dealt with and incorporated
into the incident for public relations reasons.
It is working. |
|
|
EMT training is in the works, as is disaster mortuary, mass casualty, mass fatality, train accident, haz-mat, traffic control, shelter management and any other emergency management discipline I can find for them. They are eating it up. They feel special, privilege to be respected members of the DSW program and the emergency management community. They acquitted themselves very well in the recent Simi Valley Fire incident. |
|
I
want the best trained and equipped emergency response group in the country.
When they show up at an incident I want them to be a trusted resource
for the incident commander. I want to be able to say: "I have fifteen qualified EMTs,
twelve traffic controllers, twenty mass-casualty specialists, fourteen
disaster mortuary specialists, stretcher teams, cribbers, haz-mat
experts", whatever. The
incident commander can then just give me orders to fill and we will become a
sought-after resource. It's already happening.
The emergency management professionals are positively gushy about our
response to the recent wildland fires. The
program is new; it is not being done anywhere else. I know this because I am making it up as I go along.
As it progresses I will elaborate with future articles as they become
appropriate. |
|
Return to THE CONNECTION |
|
|
© All rights reserved, North American Emergency Management, 1998